site stats

Cit vs. godavari saraf

WebOur attention was also drawn to a decision of this court in CIT v. Smt. Godavaridevi Saraf [1978] 113 ITR 589, where it was observed that an authority like the Income-tax Appellate … WebBy his order dated October 22, 1973, passed under section 140A(3), the Income-tax Officer levied a penalty of Rs. 800. 3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Income-tax Officer, …

Covid 19- historic judgement – karmanye foundation

WebMar 8, 2012 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the fina... WebSuch a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]." astrum wikipedia https://calderacom.com

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V. GODAVARIDEVI SARAF

WebJul 4, 2016 · Such a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]. WebThe Tribunal followed the ratio of the decision of this court in the case of CIT v. P. Muncherji and Co. [1987] 167 ITR 671. The Tribunal has declined to refer the above question to us as the same is covered by the above decision. 4. In the case of CIT v. P. Muncherji and Co. [1987] 167 ITR, a Division Bench of this court has taken the view ... WebMar 7, 2024 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent … a star kenya

FIRST BIG LEAP - Held That >>> Decision of any High Court.

Category:Decision Of Any High Court Binding On All Authorities …

Tags:Cit vs. godavari saraf

Cit vs. godavari saraf

Covid 19- historic judgement – karmanye foundation

WebCIT had no jurisdiction as there was no order under s. 127 as the order was quashed by the High Court passed under s. 127 and for this he relied upon the decision of the Bombay … WebHeld That >>> Decision of any High Court binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India, untill contrary view is taken by other HC... Case Law >>> …

Cit vs. godavari saraf

Did you know?

WebSep 30, 2024 · The Bombay High Court has, in CIT Vidarbha vs. Godavari Devi Saraf, held that law laid down by the High Court, even in it is of a different state, ought to be respected. 20. In CCE vs. Valson Dyeing Bleaching and Printing Works [2010 (259) ELT 33 (Bom.)] the Bombay High Court had upheld the Tribunal decision wherein Tribunal had followed a ... WebSep 11, 2024 · CIT Vs. Godavari Devi Saraf (1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom) In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in disallowing exemption u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) with respect to renovation expenses. ... On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the order of the AO by holding that any investment made …

WebCIT vs. Mangalal Mohanlal Panchal (HUF) 210 ITR 580 (Guj) CIT vs. Smt. Godavari Saraf 113 ITR 589 ... In the case of Mayavati vs. CIT the Hon'ble Delhi 44 ITA No.93/Ahd/2007 Asst. Year 1998-99 High Court the judgment in the case of Haryana Acrilyc Manufacturing Co. (supra) was explained as under :- "Mr. Salve learned senior counsel ... WebSep 11, 2009 · CIT(A) dismissed, the appeal of assessee by holding that full and true disclosure of all material facts was not done by the assessee during the original assessment proceedings he held the re-assessment proceedings to be valid. Coming to the first argument of the assessee we find that the notice for reopening the assessment u/s 147 …

WebHeld That >>> Decision of any High Court binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India, untill contrary view is taken by other HC... Case Law >>> CIT vs. Godavari Saraf...

WebFebruary 2015, passed by the learned CIT(A) in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for the …

WebAug 3, 2016 · (A) CIT Vs Godavari Power & Ispat Ltd (223 Taxman 234) (Chattisgarh HC) "30. The Steel-Division of the Assessee is a consumer. The CPP of...consideration before Chhattisgarh High Court in case of CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under... a standup guyWebe of transfer of the original asset. CIT(A) also agrees that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the decisions of the Hon'ble Karnataka and Calcutta High Courts but … astrum wifi adapterWebBombay High Court, in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf reported in 119 ITR 539 held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the final law of the land ... astrum nebulaWebAug 25, 2024 · "Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding … a star wikipediaWebMar 8, 2012 · Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to … a star plumbing dallasWebJun 24, 2016 · Such a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Honble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]. 10. astrup burgundy - 45WebOct 12, 2024 · Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by the other competent supreme court, which is binding on a Tribunal within the relevant State, it’s … astrup hansen